LogoLogo
  • 1. GASFLOW Code
    • 1.1. Overview
    • 1.2. Code Approach
    • 1.3. Code Features
    • 1.4. Graphical User Interface
    • 1.5. Code V&V
    • 1.6. Application Highlights
    • 1.7. Publications
    • 1.8. Current Activities
  • 2. Tutorials
    • 2.1. Overview
    • 2.2. Sod's Shock Tube Problem
    • 2.3. Mesh Generation from CAD Models
    • 2.4. 2D Lid-driven Cavity Flow
    • 2.5. Hydrogen Diffusion into Air in a 1D Duct
    • 2.6. Supersonic Flow over a Forward-facing Step
    • 2.7. Vented Explosion of Premixed Hydrogen-Air Mixtures
    • 2.8. Transient Laminar Jet Flow at Low Mach Number Regime
  • 3. Brief User Guide
    • 3.1. Overview
    • 3.2. General User Guidance
    • 3.3. Unit System and Files
    • 3.4. Mesh Generation
    • 3.5. Geometry Definition
    • 3.6. Numerical Control
    • 3.7. Gas Species and Properties
    • 3.8. Initial and Boundary Conditions
    • 3.9. Solid Heat Structures
    • 3.10. Physical Models
    • 3.11. Restart and Output
    • 3.12. GASFLOW Parallelization
  • 4. Pre- and Post-Processing Tools
    • 4.1. GASVIEW
    • 4.2. Pyscan
    • 4.3. Create3D
  • 5. Verification and Validation
    • 5.1.Overview
    • 5.2. Fluid Dynamics
      • [AS-FD 1] Steady-State and Laminar Flow Startup
      • [AS-FD 2] Transient Compressible Flow
      • [AS-FD 3] Diffusion of Hydrogen into Air
      • [AS-FD 4] Flow past a Rectangular Block
      • [AS-FD 5] 1D Flow with an Orifice
      • [ED-FD 1] Incompressible Laminar Flow in a Lid-driven Cavity
      • [ED-FD 2] Stationary Turbulent Channel Flow
      • [ED-FD 3] Turbulent Flow between Two Parallel Plates
      • [ED-FD 4] Flow over Backward-Facing Step
      • [ED-FD 5] Transient Supersonic Flow at Mach 3 over a Forward-facing Step
      • [ED-FD 6] Large Eddy Simulations of the Turbulent Jet Flow
      • [ED-FD-7] Hydrogen Turbulent Dispersion in Nuclear Containment Compartment
      • [ED-FD 8] Buoyant Jet from Unintended Hydrogen Release
      • [ED-FD 9] Radiolytic Gas Accumulation in a Pipe
      • [ED-FD 10] Supersonic Flow at Mach 2 over a Backward Facing Step
    • 5.3. Combustion
      • [ED-CM 1] BOM Spherical Combustion Chamber
      • [ED-CM 2] SNL Flame Acceleration Measurement Facility Experiment
      • [ED-CM 3] Hydrogen Deflagration in a Multi-compartment System
      • [ED-CM 4] Hydrogen Jet Fire in a Compartment with Venting Hole
      • [ED-CM 5] Hydrogen-Air Fast Deflagration in ENACCEF Facility
      • [ED-CM 6] Detonation of Premixed H2-Air Mixture in a Hemispherical Balloon
      • [ED-CM 7] H2 Deflagration at a Refueling Station
      • [ED-CM 8] Methane-Air Explosion in LLEM
      • [ED-CM 9] Hydrogen-Methane Combution in a 20 L Spherical Vessel
    • 5.4. Heat and Mass Transfer
      • [AS-HT 1] Steady-State Heat Transfer through a Wall
      • [AS-HT 2] Pressure-Volume Work Term 1: Equilibrium Case
      • [AS-HT 3] Thermodynamic Benchmarks
      • [AS-HT 4] Uniform Energy Addition to Stagnant Fluid
      • [ED-HT 1] Natural Convection in an Air-filled Square Cavity
      • [ED-HT 2] Validation of the condensation model with COPAIN facility
      • [ED-HT 3] Heat and mass transfer of a thin film model in a channel
      • [ED-HT 4] Validation of the Film Model in the Integral Test Facility for Passive Containment Cooling
      • [ED-HT 5] Stratification Erosion Benchmark
      • [ED-HT 6] Battelle Containment HYJET Test JX7
      • [ED-HT 7] Battelle GX Tests
      • [ED-HT 8] Tests in ThAI Facility
      • [ED-HT 9] HDR Tests
      • [ED-HT 10] Phebus Thermal Hydraulic Tests
      • [ED-HT 11] Test Tosqan ISP47
      • [ED-HT 12] Test MISTRA ISP47
      • [ED-HT 13] Panda SETH Test Program
    • 5.5. Multiphase Flow
      • [AS-MP 1] Particle Terminal Velocity
      • [AS-MP 2] Water droplet evaporation
      • [ED-MP 1] Spray Single Droplet Test
      • [ED-MP 2] Spray Droplets Test 113 at IRSN TOSQAN
      • [ED-MP 3] Spray Droplets Test 101 at IRSN TOSQAN
  • 6. APPLICATION HIGHLIGHTS
    • 6.1. H2 Fuel Cell Vehicle Accident in Tunnel
    • 6.2. Hydrogen Explosion in a Refueling Station
    • 6.3. Hydrogen Explosion at Fukushima Accident
    • 6.4. Methane Explosion in the Roadway of a Coal Mine
    • 6.5. Aerosols and Droplets
      • 6.5.1. Coronavirus Aerosol Transmission
      • 6.5.2. Water Droplets
  • 7. Ongoing Development and Enhancements
    • 7.1. Combustion Modeling
      • 7.1.1. Multi-step Global Methane Combustion Models
        • 7.1.1.1. One-step Reaction Mechanism
        • 7.1.1.2. Two-step Reaction Mechanism
        • 7.1.1.3. Three-step Reaction Mechanism
        • 7.1.1.4. Four-step Reaction Mechanism
        • 7.1.1.5. Five-step Reaction Mechanism
        • 7.1.1.6. FAQ
      • 7.1.2. Laminar Flame Speed Correlations for Methane-air Mixtures
        • 7.1.2.1. Stone's Correlation
        • 7.1.2.2. Elia's Correlation
        • 7.1.2.3. Takizawa's Correlation
        • 7.1.2.4. Liao's Correlation
      • 7.1.3. Turbulent Flame Speed Correlations for Methane-air Mixtures
      • 7.1.4. Correction of Effective Turbulent Burning Velocity for Lean Hydrogen-air Mixtures
      • 7.1.5. Induction Time Model
      • 7.1.6. Detailed Chemical Kinetic Modeling
      • 7.1.7. Jet Flame Modeling
    • 7.2. Discrete Particle Modeling
      • 7.2.1. Particle mass in user-defined volumes - volpardef
      • 7.2.2. Particle injection from ring shaped volumes
    • 7.3. Heat Transfer Modeling
      • 7.3.1. Time-dependent tables for heat flux and heat transfer coefficient in sinkdef
      • 7.3.2. Thermal Radiation Model for Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide
  • 8. INPUT FILE EXAMPLES
    • 8.1. Overview
    • 8.1. Fluid Dynamics
  • 8.2. Combustion
  • 8.3. Heat Transfer
  • 8.4. Multiphase Flow
  • 8.5. Applications
  • 9. Frequently Asked Questions
    • 9.1. How to set up models for the flashing of pressurized water?
  • 9.2. How to run GASFLOW on Windows?
  • 9.3. How to export/import WSL distribution?
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • 7.1.4.1. Purpose
  • 7.1.4.2. Model descriptions
  • Laminar burning velocity
  • Laminar burning velocity considering effects of pressure and temperature
  • Flame wrinkling factor induced by Landau-Darriues (LD) and thermal-diffusive (TD) instabilities
  • Flame wrinkling factor due to self-induced turbulence driven by hydrodynamic instability
  • Flame stretch factor induced by local flame front curvature
  • Turbulent burning velocity correlations
  • 7.1.4.3. Input example
  • Combustion model
  • Initial turbulence conditions
  • Input file
  • Reference

Was this helpful?

  1. 7. Ongoing Development and Enhancements
  2. 7.1. Combustion Modeling

7.1.4. Correction of Effective Turbulent Burning Velocity for Lean Hydrogen-air Mixtures

for GASFLOW-MPI revision 4671 or newer

Previous7.1.3. Turbulent Flame Speed Correlations for Methane-air MixturesNext7.1.5. Induction Time Model

Last updated 3 months ago

Was this helpful?

7.1.4.1. Purpose

In this multi-phenomena combustion model, more effects on flame acceleration at low turbulence are considered in the effective turbulent burning velocity, including:

  • Laminar unstretched burning velocity considering effects of transient pressure and temperature.

  • Flame surface area enlargement due to small-scale flame front wrinkling caused by Landau-Darriues (LD) and thermal-diffusive (TD) instabilities.

  • Pressure effect on flame surface area enlargement due to small scale flame front wrinkling.

  • Flame surface area enlargement due to self-induced turbulence driven by hydrodynamic instability.

  • Local flame front curvature and the resulting stretch on laminar burning velocity.

  • Flow turbulence in the unburned mixtures.

7.1.4.2. Model descriptions

GASFLOW-MPI input options below have to be selected.

iburn = 4, ; combustion progress variable transport for hydrogen-air mixtures

isourcexi = 2, ; models based on gradient of combustion progress variable

Laminar burning velocity

ilamfs : GASFLOW-MPI options for calculation of the laminar burning velocity: SL,0. (default: ilamfs =1)

Laminar burning velocity considering effects of pressure and temperature

ithetath: GASFLOW-MPI options for exponents to correct the laminar burning velocity. (default: ithetath = 1)

Flame wrinkling factor induced by Landau-Darriues (LD) and thermal-diffusive (TD) instabilities

ielp: GASFLOW-MPI options for flame wrinkling induced by TD instabilities. (default: ielp = 0)

flcri_radius0: GASFLOW-MPI input variable for flame front critical radius (cm). (default: flcri_radius0 = 110)

Flame wrinkling factor due to self-induced turbulence driven by hydrodynamic instability

iesturb: GASFLOW-MPI options for flame wrinkling induced by hydrodynamic instability. (default: iesturb = 0)

ifgeo: GASFLOW-MPI options for geometry effect.1: for sphere, 2: for tubes. (default: ifgeo = 1)

flcri_radius0: GASFLOW-MPI input variable for flame front critical radius (cm). (default: flcri_radius0 = 110)

esturb_phi: GASFLOW-MPI input variable for the coefficient of flame wrinkling factor. For near-stoichiometric mixtures: esturb_phi = 0.5 is recommended. For lean hydrogen/air mixtures, esturb_phi=1.0 is recommended. (default: esturb_phi = 1.0)

fgeo_coef: coefficient for tube (default: fgeo_coef = 0.5)

Flame stretch factor induced by local flame front curvature

ifstretch: GASFLOW-MPI options for flame stretch factor induced by local flame front curvature. (default: ifstretch = 0)

Turbulent burning velocity correlations

iturbflame: GASFLOW-MPI options for turbulent burning velocity correlation. (default: iturbflame = 0)

7.1.4.3. Input example

Combustion model

Input example for hydrogen flame acceleration in a tube

           iburn_malloc    = 1,     ; allocate memory for combustion restart calculation
           iburn           = 4,     ; combustion models based on progress variable for hydrogen-air mixtures
           ilamxi          = 1,     ; calculate laminar diffusion term in the xi equation
           iturbxi         = 1,     ; calculate turbulent diffusion term in the xi equation
           isourcexi       = 2,     ; 2: Gradient Model; 
           iturbflame      = 6,     ; options for the turbulent burning/flame velocity
           ilamfs          = 1,     ; options for laminar flame speed
           ithetath        = 1,     ; options for pressure and temperature correction of laminar flame speed
           ielp            = 1,     ; options for flame wrinkling induced by TD instabilities  
           iesturb         = 1,     ; options for flame wrinkling due to self-induced turbulence 
                                    ; driven by hydrodynamic instability
           ifstretch       = 1,     ; options for flame stretch factor induced by local flame front curvature
           ifgeo           = 2,     ; options for geometrical effect (1: sphere; 2: tube)

           fgeo_coef       = 0.35,  ; model constant for flame propagation in tubes
           flcri_radius0   = 275,   ; flame front critical radius (cm) used when iesturb = 1 and ielp = 1
                                    ; increase flcri_radius0 can slow down the pressure increase in the tube

           iref_unburnt = 2,
           jref_unburnt = 2,
           kref_unburnt = 400,
           Schmidt_turb = 0.9,

           xi_ignitdef(1:10,1) = 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 0.0, 1e-5, 0, ; Ignitor Model

Initial turbulence conditions

The calculation results may be sensitive to the initial turbulent conditions. Below is the default values of turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate in GASFLOW-MPI.

           ; define the initial turbulent conditions
           turbdef(1:12,1) = 1, 10, 1, 13, 1, 401, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0.0, 0.0,
           tkeval          = 40,     ; initial turbulent kinetic energy
           epsval          = 30,    ; initial turbulent dissipation rate

Input file

Reference

[1] U. Maas, J. Warnatz, Ignition processes in hydrogen-oxygen mixtures, Combustion and Flame, Volume 74, Issue 1, 1988, Pages 53-69.

[2] Toshio Iijima, Tadao Takeno, Effects of temperature and pressure on burning velocity, Combustion and Flame, Volume 65, Issue 1, 1986, Pages 35-43

[3] ETTNER, F. Effiziente Numerische Simulation des Deflagrations-Detonations-Übergangs. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München, 2013.

[4] Bentaib, A., Chaumeix, N., 2012. SARNET H2 Combustion Benchmark Diluent: Effect on Flame Propagation Blind Phase Results. Tech. Rep., IRSN.

[5] Katzy P. Combustion model for the computation of flame propagation in lean hydrogen-air mixtures at low turbulence[D]. Technische Universität München, 2021.

[6] Wieland C H. Efficient Simulation of Flame Acceleration and Deflagration-to-Detonation Transition in Smooth Geometries[D]. Technische Universität München, 2022.

[7] J.K. Bechtold and M. Matalon. The Dependence of the Markstein Length on Stoichiometry. Combustion and Flame, 127(1-2):1906– 1913, 2001.

[8] Molkov V. Fundamentals of Hydrogen Safety Engineering, parts I & II. Free download e-book, bookboon.com, ISBN: 978-87-403-0279-0. 2012.

[9] Xiao H, Makarov D, Sun J, Molkov V. Experimental and numerical investigation of premixed flame propagation with distorted tulip shape in a closed duct. Combust Flame 2012;159:1523e38.

[10] Gostintsev YA, Istratov AG, Shulenin YV. Self-similar propagation of a free turbulent flame in mixed gas mixtures. Combust Explos Shock Waves 1989;24(5).

[11] S.C. Taylor. Burning Velocity and the Influence of Flame Stretch. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, 1991.

35KB
ingf